{ "schemaVersion": "1.0", "reviewedAt": "2026-08-12", "status": "Prepared locally; no invitations or completed reviews claimed", "rules": [ "Invite one reviewer for one assignment initially. A second assignment follows only after the first response is complete and remains inside the reviewer's declared lens.", "Do not select reviewers for expected agreement. Record declines, conflicts, unavailable expertise and source-access barriers without replacing them silently.", "Provide packet version, exact claim, trace, comparison when assigned, all six common review questions and the same response template.", "Require relevant experience and relationship disclosure. Compensation, authorship, commercial ties and prior collaboration do not disappear because they are inconvenient.", "Classify every completed response through one finite outcome and propagate accepted changes before asking for endorsement or another review.", "Review round progress only after two completed reviewers span at least two lenses; this is a first evidence checkpoint, not whole-site validation." ], "responseOutcomes": [ "correction-accepted", "scope-clarified", "source-added", "awaiting-full-text", "no-change", "not-usable", "withdrawn" ], "responseFields": [ "assignment id", "review packet version", "review lens", "relevant experience statement", "relationship disclosure", "exact claim or comparison section", "stable source considered", "answer to all six common review questions", "proposed bounded wording", "reviewer permission for public identity or anonymous attribution", "publisher outcome", "public response path", "correction propagation completed" ], "assignments": [ { "id": "round1-taxonomy-identity", "lensId": "taxonomy", "claimId": "colour-identity", "comparisonId": "taxonomy-name-history", "selectionReason": "Species names, visible phenotype, market labels and later taxonomic reassignment are easy to collapse into one identity claim, and that error can propagate through sourcing and breeding records.", "reviewerScope": "Audit the published source taxon, specimens, characters, loci, reference material, accepted-name use and every transfer from a population result to a photographed or traded animal.", "consequentialFailure": "The project silently modernizes a historical name, authenticates a photographed animal or line from colour, or treats one barcode, database or trade label as complete identity." }, { "id": "round1-taxonomy-lineage", "lensId": "taxonomy", "claimId": "mixed-colours", "comparisonId": "colour-phenotype-and-identity", "selectionReason": "The project separates visible phenotype, environmental plasticity, pigmentation mechanisms and documented ancestry while rejecting deterministic seller-chart inheritance claims.", "reviewerScope": "Audit whether the wording distinguishes phenotype, line name, pedigree, source population, genetic inference and complete F1 or F2 outcome records without overstating molecular studies.", "consequentialFailure": "The project implies that named colour lines have authenticated genetic identity, predicts an undocumented cross or converts environmental colour change into evidence for or against inherited lineage." }, { "id": "round1-design-temperature", "lensId": "design", "claimId": "warmer-faster", "comparisonId": "temperature-outcomes", "selectionReason": "Several direct experiments report different temperature-related endpoints, creating a high-risk opportunity to confuse faster development with better reproduction, welfare or lifetime outcome.", "reviewerScope": "Audit experimental units, allocation, temperatures, durations, life stages, endpoint separation, denominators and whether the reconciliation transfers beyond each tested protocol.", "consequentialFailure": "The synthesis selects one favorable endpoint, mistakes animals for independent treatment units or turns a study temperature into a universal optimum or safe interval." }, { "id": "round1-design-density", "lensId": "design", "claimId": "stocking-formula", "comparisonId": null, "selectionReason": "The density evidence is direct but narrow, and a mistaken experimental-unit or transfer inference can become an appealing shrimp-per-gallon rule for complete multigeneration aquaria.", "reviewerScope": "Audit vessel replication, unequal starting counts, repeated group weighing, pooled biochemical material, model-estimated survival and transfer from juvenile grow-out vessels to home colonies.", "consequentialFailure": "The project treats individual shrimp as independent density replicates, hides pooling or attrition, or converts a short vessel experiment into a home-aquarium capacity formula." }, { "id": "round1-husbandry-quarantine", "lensId": "husbandry", "claimId": "quarantine-clock", "comparisonId": null, "selectionReason": "Biosecurity advice can create false confidence or encourage unnecessary prophylactic treatment when separation, observation, organism detection and clearance are compressed into one clock.", "reviewerScope": "Audit whether the actions preserve separate contact networks, dedicated wet equipment, welfare-conscious observation, uncertainty about detection and a defined release decision without claiming pathogen-free status.", "consequentialFailure": "The project presents one duration as clearance, recommends routine unverified treatment, ignores equipment-mediated contact or implies that visual normality protects an established colony." }, { "id": "round1-husbandry-tankmates", "lensId": "husbandry", "claimId": "peaceful-fish", "comparisonId": null, "selectionReason": "Adult coexistence is often sold as compatibility even though juvenile recruitment, injury, chronic behavior and welfare require different observations and safeguards.", "reviewerScope": "Audit whether the guidance distinguishes adult display from recruitment, names fish identity and size, preserves habitat and life-stage context and avoids recruiting uncontrolled risky introductions.", "consequentialFailure": "The project supplies a universal safe-fish list, treats surviving adults as juvenile outcome evidence or recommends a tankmate trial without complete counts and humane stopping authority." }, { "id": "round1-synthesis-grazing", "lensId": "synthesis", "claimId": "cleanup-crew", "comparisonId": "grazing-and-system-nutrients", "selectionReason": "Direct grazing, surface removal, litter processing and water-column nutrient results can all be true while supporting very different claims about cleaning and whole-system export.", "reviewerScope": "Audit the mapping from each source method to compartment and endpoint, the reconciliation of local removal with material recycling and the accessibility of the practical decision boundary.", "consequentialFailure": "The synthesis averages unlike outcomes, hides a contrary compartment, implies total waste export or markets an animal as maintenance equipment rather than describing bounded grazing behavior." }, { "id": "round1-synthesis-chemical", "lensId": "synthesis", "claimId": "copper-absolute", "comparisonId": "chemical-response-and-safe-threshold", "selectionReason": "Mortality, biochemical response, transcript change, nominal exposure and water-chemistry context are frequently flattened into absolute product-safety or lethal-concentration claims.", "reviewerScope": "Audit chemical identity, exposure verification, taxon, endpoint, duration, experimental unit, water chemistry and the boundary between a laboratory response and a household care threshold.", "consequentialFailure": "The project converts a molecular response or short no-death result into a universal safe number, certifies a product from an ingredient label or implies a treatment dose." } ] }