INDEPENDENT NEOCARIDINA REVIEW INVITATION
Round version: 1.0
Review packet version: 1.2
Assignment: round1-husbandry-tankmates
Lens: Aquatic husbandry and welfare

Molt & Moss is a seller-publisher seeking criticism of one bounded public claim. This is not a request for endorsement, a testimonial or agreement with the site.

Claim: Peaceful fish are shrimp-safe
Claim page: https://moltandmoss.com/care/claims/peaceful-fish
Guide: https://moltandmoss.com/care/tankmates
Selection reason: Adult coexistence is often sold as compatibility even though juvenile recruitment, injury, chronic behavior and welfare require different observations and safeguards.
Your review scope: Audit whether the guidance distinguishes adult display from recruitment, names fish identity and size, preserves habitat and life-stage context and avoids recruiting uncontrolled risky introductions.
Consequential failure to check: The project supplies a universal safe-fish list, treats surviving adults as juvenile outcome evidence or recommends a tankmate trial without complete counts and humane stopping authority.
Complete assignment packet: https://moltandmoss.com/research/independent-review-round/packets/round1-husbandry-tankmates.txt

COMMON REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Is the reviewed claim stated precisely enough to audit?
2. Does the supported wording stay inside the source taxon, unit, comparison, duration and endpoint?
3. Does the limitation name the nearest consequential inference the evidence cannot carry?
4. Is the next action observable, measurable or reversible without becoming diagnosis or treatment authorization?
5. Is a consequential source, contrary result, conflict or uncertainty missing?
6. What exact wording should change, if any, and which stable source supports that change?

Please state the relevant experience used for this review and disclose any seller, breeder, author, employer, affiliate, paid, gifted or prior-collaboration relationship. Declining or identifying a scope conflict is useful and will be recorded without penalty.

Submit one exact critique and stable source through https://moltandmoss.com/research/challenge. Molt & Moss will publish a finite response to a substantive completed review. Reviewer identity is published only with permission.