Open this entry in the complete research history
Cellular recovery is not a re-feeding recipe
The evidence library is allowed to change in public. This page preserves the revised boundary, why it moved and which guides were affected.
What changed
The feeding, anatomy and health guides now include a linked 2019 starvation and re-feeding midgut study while separating tissue-marker changes from a routine fast, mortality threshold, recovery ration, visible diagnosis and health benefit.
Why it changed
The study isolated adults in algae-suppressed 250 mL containers and imported non-starved controls from a 2016 paper. Most 21-day animals reportedly died without a survival analysis, animal counts conflict with the quantitative n, re-feeding ration was omitted and the apoptosis table prints impossible zero means with positive standard deviations.
Sources reviewed for this change
Affected practical guides
A public change is not automatically a retraction. A source may be added, a scope narrowed, a gap refined or an error corrected. The current guide and registry record own the current wording.
Follow or challenge the record
Subscribe to the research-update feed or submit a stable source and proposed correction.