Open this record in the complete research map
Particle shape does not affect ingestion and egestion of microplastics by the freshwater shrimp Neocaridina palmata
Klein, Hess, Nungess, Schulte-Oehlmann and Oehlmann, 2021. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28: 62246-62254.
This record is a claim boundary, not a quality badge. Evidence class and species relationship describe what was studied. They do not make the result universal, complete or automatically applicable to a home aquarium.
- Source taxon as published
- Neocaridina palmata, White Pearl variety as purchased
- Environment
- Individual shrimp in 500 mL laboratory vessels containing reconstituted water, with particles settled before each 24-hour exposure
- Life stages
- adult selected by size
- Reviewed
- 2026-08-12
What was studied
Study shape: One independent run used eight one-shrimp vessels per treatment. A 24-hour concentration series compared fluorescent polyethylene bead mixtures or milled polyvinyl chloride fragments, a separate fragment series added food, and separate groups exposed at 20000 particles/L were either sampled immediately or moved to particle-free vessels with food for four hours.
Experimental unit: Individual 500 mL vessel and shrimp; seven to eight surviving replicates per treatment in one independent run
Endpoints: particles in rinsed whole-shrimp lysate, particles recovered from excretions, body length, sex, observed mortality.
Claim boundary
What it can support: Under this protocol, mean particle recovery in whole-shrimp lysates rose across the 24-hour concentration series, smaller beads were recovered more often than larger beads, particles appeared in four-hour excretion samples and adding food did not produce a significant fragment-uptake difference.
What it cannot support: The source used N. palmata rather than N. davidi and did not independently verify the White Pearl trade identity. Shape was confounded with polymer, size distribution, suspension preparation and optical detection; fragments at or below 5 micrometres were excluded. The supplement reports group summaries rather than animal-level data, one incomplete nominal-versus-actual concentration example, separate highly variable immediate and four-hour groups and no outlier identities or corrected results. Three deaths across different treatments do not establish particle toxicity. Whole-animal lysate cannot localize particles to gut or tissue, and the study measured no chronic survival, growth, reproduction, histology or home-aquarium threshold.
Publication status audit
Matched in dated Crossref query
The canonical DOI appeared in the dated broad query and carried no registered update in that response. This is a metadata observation, not proof that the work has never changed.
Metadata snapshot reviewed 2026-08-12. Inspect the method, unmatched queue and limitations.
Correction impact
If this source boundary changes, these are the known downstream consumers. The list distinguishes scientific re-review from generated parity and historical follow-up.
Editorial review required (5)
This curated wording or synthesis must be reconsidered when the source boundary changes. A passing generator test cannot decide the new scientific meaning.
- chemical-safety decision card Tank-side decision card
The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes. - chemical-safety practical guide Practical guide
The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary. - microplastic-exposure knowledge gap Canonical knowledge gap
The current knowledge-gap boundary depends on a dated search that used this exact source and must be reconsidered if the source meaning changes. - microplastic-exposure answerability brief Answerability brief
The decision, endpoint, minimum design or closure rule may change when evidence used in the linked gap search is corrected. - microplastic-exposure research allocation Current research allocation
The current allocation, activation trigger, next permitted unit or stop decision may change when evidence used in the linked gap search is corrected.
Generated from governing registry (10)
This surface derives from a governing registry and should update with it, but release tests must still prove parity and routing.
- Record CSL-JSON citation Citation export
The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry. - Record RIS citation Citation export
The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry. - Complete CSL-JSON bibliography Citation export
The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record. - Complete RIS bibliography Citation export
The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record. - chemical-safety portable decision card Generated decision-card text
The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links. - chemical-safety complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section. - Particle shape does not affect ingestion and egestion of microplastics by the freshwater shrimp Neocaridina palmata Canonical evidence page
The canonical evidence page derives from the current evidence registry record. - chemical-safety evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path. - Machine-readable knowledge export Machine-readable knowledge export
The versioned export includes the complete evidence registry and source-integrity audit. - Research map record Research map
The research map derives its source boundary from the evidence registry.
Historical record needs follow-up decision (2)
Do not silently rewrite history. Decide whether the prior change record remains accurate and publish a new correction or scope note when needed.
- Which direct Neocaridina microplastic studies measure individual growth, reproduction or survival under home-like histories? Dated literature search
The dated search used this exact source as a candidate (included: Particle shape does not affect ingestion and egestion of microplastics by the freshwater shrimp Neocaridina palmata). Preserve the search history and decide whether a revised or additional search is required. - Recovered particles are not a measured health effect Historical research change
The historical change cites this source. Preserve the old decision and decide whether a new public correction is required.
How this record is classified
Controlled experiment: An assigned treatment or controlled comparison. The treatment, unit, duration and endpoint still limit the claim.
Direct Neocaridina evidence: The source measured animals named within Neocaridina. Direct still does not mean universal or sufficient.
Topics: Chemical exposure, Feeding, Health
Critically appraise this source without a score
These questions fit this record's controlled experiment role. They are prompts, not automatic judgments. Open the original source to answer them.
- Identity and provenance: How were the organism, population, stock and life stage identified and sourced? A published name or seller label can hide a taxonomic, population or life-stage transfer.
- Independent unit: What unit was independently assigned or sampled, and how many units support each comparison? Animal counts do not create independent replication when animals share a vessel, site, family or treatment history.
- Comparison and context: What was the actual comparator, allocation process, environment, duration and material condition? A result has meaning only against the comparison and conditions that produced it.
- Endpoint and measurement: Which endpoint was measured, with what method, unit, timing, resolution and decision rule? One endpoint cannot silently become survival, welfare, diagnosis, reproduction or long-term population performance.
- Denominators and missingness: Are starting counts, exclusions, losses, missing observations and analysis denominators reconciled? Unreported or changing denominators can alter the apparent direction, precision and applicability of a result.
- Transfer boundary: What is the nearest tempting aquarium claim that this source design cannot establish? Direct evidence can still be narrow, and adjacent evidence can be useful only while the inference remains visible.
- Treatment assignment: Were independent units assigned to treatments, and were baseline conditions comparable? Unclear allocation or baseline imbalance can confound the treatment comparison.
- Replication: Were treatment vessels or other exposure units independently replicated rather than subsampled? Repeated animals or assays inside one exposure unit do not replicate the environmental treatment.
- Exposure verification: Was the treatment, dose, feed intake or environmental exposure measured and maintained as described? Nominal treatment labels may not equal the exposure animals actually received.
- Analysis: Did the statistical model match the unit, repeated measures, multiplicity and missing outcomes? A precise p-value cannot repair a mismatched unit or unaccounted comparison structure.
Where it is used
Reuse the reviewed citation boundary
Download CSL-JSON or download RIS. Both retain this record's support, limitation and review note.
Challenge a transcription, interpretation or missing boundary. A challenge changes the record only after editorial review.