Open this record in the complete research map
Acute toxicity of mixture of acetaminophen and ibuprofen to Green Neon Shrimp, Neocaridina denticulate
Sung et al., 2014. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 38(1): 8-13.
This record is a claim boundary, not a quality badge. Evidence class and species relationship describe what was studied. They do not make the result universal, complete or automatically applicable to a home aquarium.
- Source taxon as published
- River-collected animals from Tainan County, Taiwan, identified in the paper as Neocaridina denticulata; no voucher, morphology or molecular identification method reported
- Environment
- Ten- to fourteen-day-old, approximately 1.5 mm juveniles from acclimated river-source stock were tested in 1-litre glass beakers under a static-renewal guide; source stock was held at 25 +/- 1 C, pH 7.4 to 7.8, dissolved oxygen above 7.3 mg/L and hardness 38 to 45 mg CaCO3/L
- Life stages
- 10- to 14-day-old juvenile described as newly hatched
- Reviewed
- 2026-08-12
What was studied
Study shape: Nominal 96-hour mortality series tested acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone at 0.2, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 and 8 mg/L; a 1:1 series; variable acetaminophen at 0.1, 1, 2, 4 or 7.5 mg/L plus fixed 0.5 mg/L ibuprofen; and variable ibuprofen at the same levels plus fixed 0.5 mg/L acetaminophen. Stocks were prepared in DMSO. Sodium chloride at 1 to 5 g/L was used as a reference chemical, and mortality was recorded at 2, 6, 24, 48 and 96 hours.
Experimental unit: The treatment beaker, with 20 shrimp reported per group. The paper says the experiment was repeated four times and every treatment was performed in duplicate, while its mortality table reports n = 4; it does not reconcile tests, duplicate beakers and the analyzed n or explain whether beaker-level results or pooled animal counts entered each model.
Endpoints: mortality time course, 96-hour LC10 with 95 percent confidence interval, 96-hour LC50 with 95 percent confidence interval, sodium-chloride reference-chemical LC50.
Claim boundary
What it can support: Under the nominal 96-hour protocol, reported LC50 values were 6.07 mg/L for acetaminophen, 6.60 mg/L for ibuprofen, 6.23 mg/L for the 1:1 series, 4.78 mg/L for variable acetaminophen plus 0.5 mg/L ibuprofen and 6.78 mg/L for variable ibuprofen plus 0.5 mg/L acetaminophen. The experiment supports ratio-specific mortality curves under those exact series.
What it cannot support: The treatment concentrations were nominal, the paper does not report analytical verification, the DMSO fraction or a DMSO-matched control, and renewal frequency and test-time feeding are not stated. The equal-ratio LC50 does not clearly say whether concentration means each component or their sum. The unequal-series LC50 values describe the variable component while omitting the fixed 0.5 mg/L co-exposure from the reported number. The confidence intervals overlap substantially, and the paper calls patterns synergistic or antagonistic without reporting a concentration-addition, independent-action, toxicity-unit, model-deviation or isobologram analysis. The abstract says a non-significant comparison had p < 0.05. The source and identity method, allocation and duplicate-to-n mapping are incomplete. Acute mortality in tiny juveniles does not establish a safe aquarium level, chronic outcome, medication instruction, disposal rule, wastewater prediction, decontamination method or universal rule for drug mixtures.
Publication status audit
Matched in dated Crossref query
The canonical DOI appeared in the dated broad query and carried no registered update in that response. This is a metadata observation, not proof that the work has never changed.
Metadata snapshot reviewed 2026-08-12. Inspect the method, unmatched queue and limitations.
Correction impact
If this source boundary changes, these are the known downstream consumers. The list distinguishes scientific re-review from generated parity and historical follow-up.
Editorial review required (2)
This curated wording or synthesis must be reconsidered when the source boundary changes. A passing generator test cannot decide the new scientific meaning.
- chemical-safety decision card Tank-side decision card
The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes. - chemical-safety practical guide Practical guide
The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
Generated from governing registry (10)
This surface derives from a governing registry and should update with it, but release tests must still prove parity and routing.
- Record CSL-JSON citation Citation export
The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry. - Record RIS citation Citation export
The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry. - Complete CSL-JSON bibliography Citation export
The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record. - Complete RIS bibliography Citation export
The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record. - chemical-safety portable decision card Generated decision-card text
The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links. - chemical-safety complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section. - Acute toxicity of mixture of acetaminophen and ibuprofen to Green Neon Shrimp, Neocaridina denticulate Canonical evidence page
The canonical evidence page derives from the current evidence registry record. - chemical-safety evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path. - Machine-readable knowledge export Machine-readable knowledge export
The versioned export includes the complete evidence registry and source-integrity audit. - Research map record Research map
The research map derives its source boundary from the evidence registry.
Historical record needs follow-up decision (1)
Do not silently rewrite history. Decide whether the prior change record remains accurate and publish a new correction or scope note when needed.
- A lower mixture LC50 is not automatic proof of synergy Historical research change
The historical change cites this source. Preserve the old decision and decide whether a new public correction is required.
How this record is classified
Controlled experiment: An assigned treatment or controlled comparison. The treatment, unit, duration and endpoint still limit the claim.
Neocaridina identity evidence: The source addresses identity, relationships or genetics within the Neocaridina complex.
Topics: Chemical exposure, Health
Critically appraise this source without a score
These questions fit this record's controlled experiment role. They are prompts, not automatic judgments. Open the original source to answer them.
- Identity and provenance: How were the organism, population, stock and life stage identified and sourced? A published name or seller label can hide a taxonomic, population or life-stage transfer.
- Independent unit: What unit was independently assigned or sampled, and how many units support each comparison? Animal counts do not create independent replication when animals share a vessel, site, family or treatment history.
- Comparison and context: What was the actual comparator, allocation process, environment, duration and material condition? A result has meaning only against the comparison and conditions that produced it.
- Endpoint and measurement: Which endpoint was measured, with what method, unit, timing, resolution and decision rule? One endpoint cannot silently become survival, welfare, diagnosis, reproduction or long-term population performance.
- Denominators and missingness: Are starting counts, exclusions, losses, missing observations and analysis denominators reconciled? Unreported or changing denominators can alter the apparent direction, precision and applicability of a result.
- Transfer boundary: What is the nearest tempting aquarium claim that this source design cannot establish? Direct evidence can still be narrow, and adjacent evidence can be useful only while the inference remains visible.
- Treatment assignment: Were independent units assigned to treatments, and were baseline conditions comparable? Unclear allocation or baseline imbalance can confound the treatment comparison.
- Replication: Were treatment vessels or other exposure units independently replicated rather than subsampled? Repeated animals or assays inside one exposure unit do not replicate the environmental treatment.
- Exposure verification: Was the treatment, dose, feed intake or environmental exposure measured and maintained as described? Nominal treatment labels may not equal the exposure animals actually received.
- Analysis: Did the statistical model match the unit, repeated measures, multiplicity and missing outcomes? A precise p-value cannot repair a mismatched unit or unaccounted comparison structure.
Where it is used
Reuse the reviewed citation boundary
Download CSL-JSON or download RIS. Both retain this record's support, limitation and review note.
Challenge a transcription, interpretation or missing boundary. A challenge changes the record only after editorial review.