Open this record in the complete research map
Long-Term Exposure of the Red Cherry Shrimp Neocaridina davidi to Diclofenac: Impact on Survival, Growth, and Reproductive Potential
Zanitti et al., 2023. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 85(2): 181-190.
This record is a claim boundary, not a quality badge. Evidence class and species relationship describe what was studied. They do not make the result universal, complete or automatically applicable to a home aquarium.
- Source taxon as published
- Neocaridina davidi
- Environment
- Sixty-six 1.5-litre laboratory aquaria at 27 C, pH 7.5 and hardness 80 mg/L as CaCO3, with aeration, Java moss, daily ad-libitum feed and complete water replacement plus re-dosing three times weekly during 63 +/- 3 days
- Life stages
- ovigerous female, mature male, embryo, newly hatched juvenile
- Reviewed
- 2026-08-12
What was studied
Study shape: Twenty-two aquaria were randomly assigned per treatment. Each began with one ovigerous female and two mature males and received control water or nominal 0.1 or 1 mg/L diclofenac. HPLC-MS/MS checks at 0 and 72 hours in two aquaria per treatment produced overall measured means of 0.0075, 0.1320 and 1.0730 mg/L, respectively. Mortality, molts, egg loss, hatching and ovarian rematuration were checked daily; surviving adults, broods, ovaries and male distal vas deferens supplied later endpoints.
Experimental unit: The 1.5-litre aquarium, with 22 aquaria per assigned treatment
Endpoints: mortality, adult specific growth rate, successive spawning timing, hatching, juvenile count and morphology, female ovarian histology, male spermatophore histology.
Claim boundary
What it can support: Under this 63-day laboratory protocol, aggregate mortality was 22.7, 39.4 and 45.5 percent, with only the 1 mg/L nominal treatment differing significantly from control. The higher treatment reduced survivor-conditioned female growth, the proportion of females hatching their first exposed brood and the proportion of advanced ovarian oocytes, shortened interspawn timing, and increased abnormal juveniles per female in the small second-spawn sample. Incubation time, male growth, male spermatophore structure and among-treatment hatchling counts did not differ significantly.
What it cannot support: The control was not an analytical zero: its two checks were 0.009 and 0.006 mg/L, for a 0.0075 mg/L mean. The lowest nonzero measured treatment averaged 0.1320 mg/L, and only two nonzero treatments were tested. Analytical checks covered two aquaria per treatment at two times. The first egg cohort had already developed partly before exposure, later brood and tissue endpoints were conditioned on female survival and successful spawning, the second-spawn abnormality result came from few females, and male dependency may not have been fully represented by aquarium in the analysis. Stock came from a dealer-derived laboratory colony without voucher or diagnostic identity confirmation; allocation blinding, feed intake, exposure-period nitrogen chemistry, tissue residues and offspring survival or growth were not reported. The preprint abstract can overstate the juvenile-count result because the paper reports no significant among-treatment decrease. The design does not establish a trace-effect threshold, safe household medication concentration, aquarium treatment, recovery, mechanism or multigeneration outcome. The SSRN and Research Square postings are duplicate preprint versions, not independent replication.
Publication status audit
Matched in dated Crossref query
The canonical DOI appeared in the dated broad query and carried no registered update in that response. This is a metadata observation, not proof that the work has never changed.
Metadata snapshot reviewed 2026-08-12. Inspect the method, unmatched queue and limitations.
Correction impact
If this source boundary changes, these are the known downstream consumers. The list distinguishes scientific re-review from generated parity and historical follow-up.
Editorial review required (4)
This curated wording or synthesis must be reconsidered when the source boundary changes. A passing generator test cannot decide the new scientific meaning.
- breeding decision card Tank-side decision card
The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes. - chemical-safety decision card Tank-side decision card
The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes. - breeding practical guide Practical guide
The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary. - chemical-safety practical guide Practical guide
The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
Generated from governing registry (13)
This surface derives from a governing registry and should update with it, but release tests must still prove parity and routing.
- Record CSL-JSON citation Citation export
The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry. - Record RIS citation Citation export
The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry. - Complete CSL-JSON bibliography Citation export
The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record. - Complete RIS bibliography Citation export
The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record. - breeding portable decision card Generated decision-card text
The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links. - chemical-safety portable decision card Generated decision-card text
The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links. - breeding complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section. - chemical-safety complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section. - Long-Term Exposure of the Red Cherry Shrimp Neocaridina davidi to Diclofenac: Impact on Survival, Growth, and Reproductive Potential Canonical evidence page
The canonical evidence page derives from the current evidence registry record. - breeding evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path. - chemical-safety evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path. - Machine-readable knowledge export Machine-readable knowledge export
The versioned export includes the complete evidence registry and source-integrity audit. - Research map record Research map
The research map derives its source boundary from the evidence registry.
Historical record needs follow-up decision (1)
Do not silently rewrite history. Decide whether the prior change record remains accurate and publish a new correction or scope note when needed.
- The diclofenac control was not an analytical zero Historical research change
The historical change cites this source. Preserve the old decision and decide whether a new public correction is required.
How this record is classified
Controlled experiment: An assigned treatment or controlled comparison. The treatment, unit, duration and endpoint still limit the claim.
Direct Neocaridina evidence: The source measured animals named within Neocaridina. Direct still does not mean universal or sufficient.
Topics: Chemical exposure, Health, Growth and lifespan, Breeding
Critically appraise this source without a score
These questions fit this record's controlled experiment role. They are prompts, not automatic judgments. Open the original source to answer them.
- Identity and provenance: How were the organism, population, stock and life stage identified and sourced? A published name or seller label can hide a taxonomic, population or life-stage transfer.
- Independent unit: What unit was independently assigned or sampled, and how many units support each comparison? Animal counts do not create independent replication when animals share a vessel, site, family or treatment history.
- Comparison and context: What was the actual comparator, allocation process, environment, duration and material condition? A result has meaning only against the comparison and conditions that produced it.
- Endpoint and measurement: Which endpoint was measured, with what method, unit, timing, resolution and decision rule? One endpoint cannot silently become survival, welfare, diagnosis, reproduction or long-term population performance.
- Denominators and missingness: Are starting counts, exclusions, losses, missing observations and analysis denominators reconciled? Unreported or changing denominators can alter the apparent direction, precision and applicability of a result.
- Transfer boundary: What is the nearest tempting aquarium claim that this source design cannot establish? Direct evidence can still be narrow, and adjacent evidence can be useful only while the inference remains visible.
- Treatment assignment: Were independent units assigned to treatments, and were baseline conditions comparable? Unclear allocation or baseline imbalance can confound the treatment comparison.
- Replication: Were treatment vessels or other exposure units independently replicated rather than subsampled? Repeated animals or assays inside one exposure unit do not replicate the environmental treatment.
- Exposure verification: Was the treatment, dose, feed intake or environmental exposure measured and maintained as described? Nominal treatment labels may not equal the exposure animals actually received.
- Analysis: Did the statistical model match the unit, repeated measures, multiplicity and missing outcomes? A precise p-value cannot repair a mismatched unit or unaccounted comparison structure.
Where it is used
Reuse the reviewed citation boundary
Download CSL-JSON or download RIS. Both retain this record's support, limitation and review note.
Challenge a transcription, interpretation or missing boundary. A challenge changes the record only after editorial review.