The Berried Clubby Molt & Moss
Menu

Open this record in the complete research map

Controlled experiment Direct Neocaridina evidence

Breeding and life cycle of the ornamental freshwater shrimp Neocaridina davidi in a biofilm-based culture system

Viau et al., 2020. Aquaculture Research 51: 3847-3864.

Open the source

This record is a claim boundary, not a quality badge. Evidence class and species relationship describe what was studied. They do not make the result universal, complete or automatically applicable to a home aquarium.

Source taxon as published
Neocaridina davidi
Environment
Designed laboratory biofilm culture across substrate treatments
Life stages
hatchling, juvenile, adult, breeding female
Reviewed
2026-08-12

What was studied

Study shape: The full life cycle and juvenile outcomes were followed while comparing conditioned artificial substrates.

Experimental unit: Substrate treatment culture unit

Endpoints: juvenile survival, growth, biomass, biochemical reserves, reproduction.

Claim boundary

What it can support: The tested biofilm community supported the life cycle and substrate treatment changed juvenile outcomes.

What it cannot support: It does not establish that any home-aquarium film is complete food or that tank age measures grazing value.

Publication status audit

Matched in dated Crossref query

The canonical DOI appeared in the dated broad query and carried no registered update in that response. This is a metadata observation, not proof that the work has never changed.

Metadata snapshot reviewed 2026-08-12. Inspect the method, unmatched queue and limitations.

Correction impact

If this source boundary changes, these are the known downstream consumers. The list distinguishes scientific re-review from generated parity and historical follow-up.

Editorial review required (15)

This curated wording or synthesis must be reconsidered when the source boundary changes. A passing generator test cannot decide the new scientific meaning.

  • A tank can hold a fixed number of shrimp per gallon Curated claim check
    The exact claim trace uses this record as limitation context: One biofilm-based multigeneration system does not establish a universal per-gallon capacity.
  • algae decision card Tank-side decision card
    The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes.
  • breeding decision card Tank-side decision card
    The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes.
  • cycling decision card Tank-side decision card
    The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes.
  • feeding decision card Tank-side decision card
    The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes.
  • habitat decision card Tank-side decision card
    The card translates this guide into an observation, first action, next record and stopping boundary, so all four require editorial review when the source changes.
  • algae practical guide Practical guide
    The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
  • breeding practical guide Practical guide
    The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
  • cycling practical guide Practical guide
    The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
  • feeding practical guide Practical guide
    The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
  • habitat practical guide Practical guide
    The guide uses this evidence record and its practical wording must remain inside the revised source boundary.
  • round1-design-density Curated first-round reviewer assignment
    The frozen reviewer scope or consequential-failure check uses this record through the assigned claim trace or comparison and must be reconsidered before invitation or response.
  • botanical-litter-outcomes knowledge gap Canonical knowledge gap
    The current knowledge-gap boundary depends on a dated search that used this exact source and must be reconsidered if the source meaning changes.
  • botanical-litter-outcomes answerability brief Answerability brief
    The decision, endpoint, minimum design or closure rule may change when evidence used in the linked gap search is corrected.
  • botanical-litter-outcomes research allocation Current research allocation
    The current allocation, activation trigger, next permitted unit or stop decision may change when evidence used in the linked gap search is corrected.

Generated from governing registry (25)

This surface derives from a governing registry and should update with it, but release tests must still prove parity and routing.

  • Record CSL-JSON citation Citation export
    The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry.
  • Record RIS citation Citation export
    The record citation export derives its note and source metadata from the evidence registry.
  • Complete CSL-JSON bibliography Citation export
    The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record.
  • Complete RIS bibliography Citation export
    The complete citation export includes every evidence registry record.
  • stocking teaching card Generated claim teaching card
    The teaching card is generated from the curated claim wording.
  • stocking portable reply Generated claim text
    The portable reply is generated from the curated claim wording.
  • algae portable decision card Generated decision-card text
    The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links.
  • breeding portable decision card Generated decision-card text
    The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links.
  • cycling portable decision card Generated decision-card text
    The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links.
  • feeding portable decision card Generated decision-card text
    The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links.
  • habitat portable decision card Generated decision-card text
    The portable text derives from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section and both permanent links.
  • algae complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
    The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section.
  • breeding complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
    The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section.
  • cycling complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
    The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section.
  • feeding complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
    The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section.
  • habitat complete visual decision card Generated decision-card visual
    The typography-only visual and exact accessibility description derive from the curated decision-card registry and must preserve every card section.
  • Breeding and life cycle of the ornamental freshwater shrimp Neocaridina davidi in a biofilm-based culture system Canonical evidence page
    The canonical evidence page derives from the current evidence registry record.
  • algae evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
    The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path.
  • breeding evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
    The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path.
  • cycling evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
    The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path.
  • feeding evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
    The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path.
  • habitat evidence dossier Generated guide dossier
    The dossier derives its linked evidence set from the record care path.
  • stocking review item Generated independent-review item
    The independent-review item derives from the exact claim trace and publication-status registry.
  • Machine-readable knowledge export Machine-readable knowledge export
    The versioned export includes the complete evidence registry and source-integrity audit.
  • Research map record Research map
    The research map derives its source boundary from the evidence registry.

Historical record needs follow-up decision (1)

Do not silently rewrite history. Decide whether the prior change record remains accurate and publish a new correction or scope note when needed.

Inspect the corpus-wide propagation audit.

How this record is classified

Controlled experiment: An assigned treatment or controlled comparison. The treatment, unit, duration and endpoint still limit the claim.

Direct Neocaridina evidence: The source measured animals named within Neocaridina. Direct still does not mean universal or sufficient.

Topics: Feeding, Habitat, Breeding, Growth and lifespan

Critically appraise this source without a score

These questions fit this record's controlled experiment role. They are prompts, not automatic judgments. Open the original source to answer them.

  1. Identity and provenance: How were the organism, population, stock and life stage identified and sourced? A published name or seller label can hide a taxonomic, population or life-stage transfer.
  2. Independent unit: What unit was independently assigned or sampled, and how many units support each comparison? Animal counts do not create independent replication when animals share a vessel, site, family or treatment history.
  3. Comparison and context: What was the actual comparator, allocation process, environment, duration and material condition? A result has meaning only against the comparison and conditions that produced it.
  4. Endpoint and measurement: Which endpoint was measured, with what method, unit, timing, resolution and decision rule? One endpoint cannot silently become survival, welfare, diagnosis, reproduction or long-term population performance.
  5. Denominators and missingness: Are starting counts, exclusions, losses, missing observations and analysis denominators reconciled? Unreported or changing denominators can alter the apparent direction, precision and applicability of a result.
  6. Transfer boundary: What is the nearest tempting aquarium claim that this source design cannot establish? Direct evidence can still be narrow, and adjacent evidence can be useful only while the inference remains visible.
  7. Treatment assignment: Were independent units assigned to treatments, and were baseline conditions comparable? Unclear allocation or baseline imbalance can confound the treatment comparison.
  8. Replication: Were treatment vessels or other exposure units independently replicated rather than subsampled? Repeated animals or assays inside one exposure unit do not replicate the environmental treatment.
  9. Exposure verification: Was the treatment, dose, feed intake or environmental exposure measured and maintained as described? Nominal treatment labels may not equal the exposure animals actually received.
  10. Analysis: Did the statistical model match the unit, repeated measures, multiplicity and missing outcomes? A precise p-value cannot repair a mismatched unit or unaccounted comparison structure.

Read the complete appraisal framework.

Where it is used

Reuse the reviewed citation boundary

Download CSL-JSON or download RIS. Both retain this record's support, limitation and review note.

Challenge a transcription, interpretation or missing boundary. A challenge changes the record only after editorial review.