Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Antcliffe et al., 2026. Royal Society Open Science 13(3): 251712.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi, with Palaemon varians as a marine comparison
Study shape: Oxygen saturation was followed for mostly 48 hours in open and closed carcass containers with carcass-free controls. A separate group of freshwater carcasses was scored daily for ten days for internal and external post-mortem change.
Experimental unit: Individual adult carcass in one container: three open and five closed freshwater oxygen containers; controls were carcass-free containers but their per-condition allocation was not clearly reported. A separate 12-carcass freshwater sequence supplied daily morphology scores.
Environment: Individual euthanized adult carcasses in 20 mL closed or 100 mL open reverse-osmosis deionized freshwater at 21 C, plus a separate open-water anatomical decay sequence
Endpoints: oxygen saturation near or around the carcass, hourly oxygen change, post-mortem internal and external morphology scores.
What it can support: In the tested 20 mL closed freshwater vials, a single adult N. davidi carcass drove oxygen saturation to complete drawdown within about one day. Open 100 mL freshwater bottles remained above full anoxia but every carcass run became at least dysoxic by 48 hours. Separate daily scoring showed rapid internal tissue opacity before major external collapse.
What it cannot support: The one-carcass-per-20-or-100-mL reverse-osmosis-water systems had no filter, substrate, plants, aeration, scavengers or living tankmates and cannot be scaled to a home aquarium, a tank-wide oxygen prediction or a removal deadline. Oxygen was reported as percent saturation and measured locally or in the tiny vial, not as aquarium mg/L. Freshwater oxygen groups were small, with three open and five closed containers, control allocation was unclear, oxygen and anatomy sequences used different euthanasia methods, and the work did not measure disease transmission, tankmate outcomes or cause of death. Clove oil and magnesium chloride methods are not home euthanasia protocols.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Neocaridina identity evidence
Feng et al., 2026. PLOS ONE 21(2): e0342746.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina denticulata sinensis
Study shape: The NdTryp gene was cloned, expression was profiled across tissues and nine embryonic stages, in situ hybridization localized transcripts, RNA interference was followed by injected Vibrio parahaemolyticus challenge, and recombinant protein activity was tested in vitro.
Experimental unit: Individual shrimp for animal endpoints, usually three animals per group or time point; the wording for pooled embryonic samples does not clearly separate the three individuals from the stated three biological replicates, and recombinant-enzyme measurements used technical triplicates
Environment: Market-sourced shrimp acclimated for seven days in recirculating laboratory aquaria at 25 C, followed by molecular assays, injected bacterial challenge and isolated recombinant-protein tests
Endpoints: tissue and developmental expression, hepatopancreatic localization, RNA interference knockdown, histopathology after bacterial injection, recombinant enzyme activity.
What it can support: NdTryp expression was highest in the hepatopancreas and localized mainly to R cells and epithelial cells lining its tubules. Expression appeared late in embryonic development, rose after the tested bacterial injection, and knockdown before challenge was associated with more severe hepatopancreatic damage than the dsEGFP challenged control.
What it cannot support: The injected laboratory challenge, small animal groups and ambiguous embryonic pooling do not establish natural infection, diagnosis, treatment, survival or pathogen clearance. The recombinant enzyme optima and 20 mM ion assays are not aquarium pH, temperature, mineral, copper or cadmium targets. No feeding trial tested trypsin as an additive, digestibility aid or growth treatment, and no explicitly described uninfected RNA interference histology control isolates knockdown injury from infection interaction.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Gorol et al., 2026. The European Zoological Journal 93(1): 563-582.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: As a continuation of the 2025 experiment, adults received clean water or nominal 1, 5 or 10 mg/L BPA for 24, 48 or 72 hours. Qualitative methods used organs from five animals per group and quantitative methods used five cell suspensions per group.
Experimental unit: Individually exposed adult and its derived organ or cell preparation; this continued the earlier exposure program and is not evidence of an independent replication
Environment: Adult shrimp held individually in 0.5-litre containers at 21 C, pH 7 and GH 10, fed ad libitum, with excrement removed every 12 hours and fresh nominal exposure water prepared for each animal
Endpoints: reactive oxygen species, apoptosis and necrosis, caspase and Bcl-2 states, DNA damage, mitochondrial structure and membrane potential, reduced glutathione.
What it can support: The assigned acute BPA treatments changed multiple intestine and hepatopancreas cell endpoints. Reactive-oxygen signals were highest after 24 hours and then declined, while cell-death, mitochondrial and DNA-damage responses varied by organ, concentration and time; hepatopancreas DNA damage was higher after 48 hours at every tested concentration.
What it cannot support: This is a continuation of the same nominal concentration and exposure design as the 2025 publication, not independent confirmation. Concentrations were not analytically verified, controls were clean-water organ groups rather than an explicitly time-matched series, and five method preparations per group do not establish the total number of independent animals across assays. Declining reactive-oxygen signal does not prove recovery because other cellular endpoints changed on different timelines. No whole-animal survival, behaviour, reproduction, chronic effect or recovery endpoint was measured. It does not establish an aquarium BPA threshold, a general plastic-safety rule or a diagnosis from visible symptoms.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Adachi et al., 2025. iScience 28(2): 111885.
Source taxon as published: Commercial Neocaridina denticulata (Neocaridina davidi), identified with partial CO1 sequence evidence
Study shape: A post-hatching time series combined light and time-lapse imaging, morphometrics, SEM, TEM, toluidine-blue sections, confocal cuticle and cell staining, and a separate WGA-injected, UV-resin-immobilized live-imaging method across the first ecdysis.
Experimental unit: Individual shrimp within each method: 15 animals for tail length and width, three per stage for SEM, two per stage for TEM, three or more per fluorescence study, and two animals with 17 tracked nodes for resin-immobilized live imaging; Videos S1 and S2 show the same 96-well individual
Environment: Commercial stock maintained in 45-litre tanks at 23 to 25 C; separated egg-carrying animals and hatchlings were examined in bottles, 300-microlitre 96-well plate units or invasive microscopy preparations
Endpoints: external uropod and telson form, telson length and width, cuticle branching and furrows, epithelial cell shape, time-lapse tail dynamics through first ecdysis.
What it can support: Under the tested developmental conditions, cuticle already separated overlapping uropod and telson primordia shortly after hatching. The first ecdysis made the uropod branches externally clear and changed the telson toward a longer, narrower form, with the visible tail-shape transition occurring within minutes in the recorded individual.
What it cannot support: This is first-instar developmental anatomy, not an adult molt interval or a home-visible molt predictor. The stock was commercially sourced, exact sex was unknown and the authors retained both N. denticulata and N. davidi because the name is disputed. Samples were small and method-specific. Fixed observations required anesthesia, dissection, fixation or staining. Captured 96-well animals molted faster, probably because of microscope heat. Live imaging used WGA injection, 395 nm curing light and heat-generating UV resin, slightly delayed ecdysis, included only two animals, did not label every cell and may have produced injury-related cells. The study did not test aquarium temperature, GH, minerals, treatment, survival, welfare or incomplete-molt prevention.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Gorol et al., 2025. The European Zoological Journal 92(1): 390-409.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Adults received clean water or nominal 1, 5 or 10 mg/L BPA for 24, 48 or 72 hours. One animal occupied each container, and five specimens from each group were selected for each microscopy, histochemistry, fluorescence or cell-cycle method.
Experimental unit: Individually exposed adult in a 0.5-litre container; method-specific samples used five animals per group, while reuse or independence across methods was not stated clearly
Environment: Adult shrimp held individually in 0.5-litre plastic containers at 21 C, pH 7 and GH 10, fed ad libitum, with excrement removed every 12 hours and fresh nominal exposure water prepared for each animal
Endpoints: intestine and hepatopancreas ultrastructure, autophagic and acidic structures, lipid, protein and polysaccharide reserves, regenerative-cell ultrastructure, Ki67-positive cells, cell-cycle phase proportions.
What it can support: The assigned acute BPA treatments produced organ-, time- and concentration-associated changes in midgut cell structure, autophagic signals, reserve material, regenerative-cell measures and cell-cycle distributions. The highest treatment produced extensive intestinal degeneration after 72 hours.
What it cannot support: Concentrations were nominal and not analytically verified. The clean-water control came from continuous culture rather than an explicitly time-matched control series, and the number of distinct animals across the many methods was not clear. The study lasted 24 to 72 hours, used adult tissue and cell endpoints, and did not report whole-animal survival, behaviour, reproduction, recovery or a chronic exposure response. It does not establish a household BPA threshold, diagnose damage from an aquarium observation or show that an unnamed plastic product caused exposure.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Neocaridina identity evidence
Huo et al., 2025. Fishes 10(3): 134.
Source taxon as published: Laboratory red, blue, yellow and wild or transparent strains labelled Neocaridina denticulata sinensis
Study shape: Adult and tissue expression used seven individual samples per strain. Embryonic expression pooled all sampled embryos from one berried female as one replicate, with seven maternal replicates per source-defined stage. For RNA interference, metanauplius embryos from each of five red-strain mothers were divided into sibling treatment and control wells of 15 embryos, exposed ex vivo after hypochlorous-acid membrane softening to 5 micrograms per millilitre NdBCO-like4 or EGFP dsRNA in ultra-pure water, and photographed after 24 hours. A transcriptome-derived candidate SNP was then targeted for genotyping in four laboratory strains.
Experimental unit: Individual shrimp for adult and tissue expression, nested within separately maintained strain tanks whose number and replication were not stated; maternal clutch for the five-mother paired RNA-interference comparison; individual shrimp for genotyping, although the reported figure totals do not reconcile with the stated 192 individuals per strain
Environment: Laboratory-owned strains selectively bred for more than three years and cultured separately in glass tanks at about 25 C, with aerated tap water, planted aquarium soil, daily compound feed and 50 percent water changes every three days
Endpoints: NdBCO-like4 expression by strain, tissue and developmental stage, RNA-interference target expression, red-channel pixel brightness ratio, pigment-particle distribution index, candidate-SNP genotype frequency, predicted RNA secondary structure.
What it can support: In the sampled laboratory strains, NdBCO-like4 expression was higher in the red strain than the yellow, blue and wild or transparent strains and varied across the five source-defined developmental stages. In the five paired maternal clutches, embryos receiving NdBCO-like4 dsRNA had lower red-channel brightness ratios and pigment-particle distribution indices than EGFP-dsRNA sibling controls under the artificial 24-hour exposure. The G.1719G>A candidate occurred in every sampled strain at different reported genotype frequencies.
What it cannot support: This is evidence of molecular involvement under the source assays, not a validated commercial-line marker, inheritance chart or consumer genetic test. The paper does not report the number of culture tanks per strain, so strain, family and shared tank history cannot be separated. The ex vivo RNA-interference protocol used removed embryos, 1 to 5 percent hypochlorous acid for 1 to 2 minutes, ultra-pure water and destructive molecular sampling; it is not a breeding or colour-enhancement method. A blank control is described but omitted from the displayed RNA-interference results, scoring regions and blinding are not reported, one reference gene was used without reported stability validation, and the split-clutch design was analysed with an independent t-test rather than an explicit paired model. The results text calls the target-expression decrease p greater than 0.05 while the discussion calls it significant. The abstract calls G.1719G>A synonymous, whereas the results and discussion call it a missense or non-synonymous D445N change. The same strain is called wild in the methods and transparent in figures. Although the methods state 192 genotyped individuals per strain, the Figure 7 genotype counts total 148 red, 95 yellow, 190 blue and 172 transparent animals, without explaining missing calls. The variant-frequency association does not establish causation, dominance, parentage, pedigree, selection response or identity for Blue Dream, Sunkist, Bloody Mary or any seller line.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Li et al., 2025. Journal of Biological Chemistry 301(7): 110298.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Histology, molecular manipulation and physiological measurements were compared across molt-related conditions.
Experimental unit: Animal or prepared tissue, depending on endpoint
Environment: Laboratory physiological and molecular experiment
Endpoints: gene expression, muscle metabolism, heart rate, gill ventilation, molting.
What it can support: Mechanistic involvement of HIF-1 alpha and glycolysis in the tested growth and molt physiology.
What it cannot support: The culture dissolved-oxygen range is not a tested aquarium minimum, and visible branchial movement cannot diagnose the pathway.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Luan et al., 2025. Biomolecules 15(6): 815.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Hepatopancreases from mature red females were pooled in threes, exposed outside the animal to farnesoic acid or methyl farnesoate and compared by RNA sequencing, pathway analysis and qPCR.
Experimental unit: Pooled hepatopancreas sample from three females, with three pooled samples per condition for the 3-hour RNA sequencing comparison
Environment: Excised hepatopancreas tissue cultured at 25 C in Schneider's Drosophila medium with 1 ppm farnesoic acid or methyl farnesoate
Endpoints: differential gene expression, pathway enrichment, qPCR agreement.
What it can support: Excised female hepatopancreas tissue showed different short-term gene-expression responses to the two tested sesquiterpenoid hormones, including digestive-enzyme-associated transcripts after farnesoic acid exposure.
What it cannot support: This was an excised-organ experiment, not a whole-animal feeding, water, growth, molt, reproduction or safety trial. The paper does not document a hormone stock solvent or a matched vehicle control, and its sequencing wording does not make the timing of the control collection fully clear. Pathway labels and gene expression do not establish improved digestion, immunity, growth or vitellogenesis.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Ostróżka et al., 2025. The European Zoological Journal 92(1): 876-895.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: A continuation using the 2024 nickel experiment scheme measured cell-cycle distribution, Ki67 proliferation, ATP and ADP/ATP, mitochondrial membrane potential, HSP70 and MnSOD in intestine and hepatopancreas. Five specimens represented each control or experimental group for each qualitative and quantitative method except Western blot. The prepublication CC BY deposit supplies the mitochondrial-potential and luminometry values plus microscopy and blot images.
Experimental unit: Individually exposed adult and its isolated organ or cell preparation, with five deposited values per group and organ for mitochondrial potential, ATP and ADP/ATP. The files do not provide specimen identifiers linking endpoints or establish whether the same five animals supplied each method; whether this was a new animal cohort independent of the 2024 publication was not stated.
Environment: Adult shrimp held individually in 0.5-litre cups at 21 C, pH 7 and GH 10 during nominal 3.63 mg Ni/L exposure for one or two weeks and one or two subsequent clean-water weeks
Endpoints: cell-cycle distribution, Ki67-positive cells, ATP concentration, ADP to ATP ratio, mitochondrial membrane potential, HSP70, MnSOD.
What it can support: The one high nominal nickel treatment produced organ- and time-associated changes in proliferation, energy and mitochondrial measures. Some measures returned toward control values during clean-water periods while others did not.
What it cannot support: This publication continues the prior nickel research program and uses its experimental scheme, so it is not evidence of an independent dose replication. Water concentration was not analytically verified, the control was the continuous culture rather than a separately described time-matched cup group, recovery groups were conditional on survival and only five values represented each deposited quantitative method group. The deposit does not link values across methods or prove independent reuse of animals. It did not measure whole-animal recovery, behaviour, reproduction or a safe household concentration.
Related source material: CC BY quantitative and image dataset
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
System observation or method study
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Pierre, Kotani and Irabor, 2025. Crustacean Research 54: 19-33.
Source taxon as published: Cultured Neocaridina denticulata from Kagoshima University; identification method not reported
Study shape: Offspring from 25 similarly staged ovigerous females were pooled in one tank after the females were removed. Cross-sectional samples were measured at four known-age checkpoints; whole animals were homogenized in ten-animal pools for amylase, lipase and protease assays, and three 60-day juveniles plus three animals described as adults were sectioned for histology.
Experimental unit: Individual for destructive cross-sectional length and wet mass; ten-animal whole-body pool with three pools per enzyme checkpoint; individual section for three juvenile and three adult histology samples; every juvenile sample shared one rearing tank
Environment: One pooled juvenile rearing tank with hornwort, filtration, aeration, twice-daily 51 percent crude-protein feed and weekly 30 percent water replacement; recorded temperature 16.9 to 19.1 C
Endpoints: total body length, wet mass, daily temperature, pH, ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and dissolved oxygen, whole-body amylase, lipase and protease specific activity, general histological structure and organ dimensions.
What it can support: In the one pooled cohort, reported mean total length rose from 2.85 mm at day 15 to 4.67, 7.84 and 12.58 mm at days 30, 45 and 60, while mean wet mass rose from 1 to 8, 17 and 39 mg. The whole-body pools detected amylase, lipase and protease activity, with reported protease activity increasing across the four juvenile checkpoints.
What it cannot support: Age, sampling date and changing culture history were confounded, with no parallel age-matched control or replicate rearing tank. The destructive cross-sectional samples did not follow the same individuals, family contributions and starting denominator were unknown, survival was not reported and feed amount or intake was not measured. Temperature was observed rather than assigned, so normal-looking growth cannot establish cold tolerance, an optimum or absence of adverse effects. The pH and nitrogen values varied and their exact analytical reporting bases were incomplete. Whole-body homogenates do not isolate digestive tissue, and three pools from one tank do not independently replicate an age effect. The Brunner-Munzel comparison plan, exact p-values, multiplicity handling and figure error bars were not fully reported. The three-per-stage histology comparison cannot establish isometric growth. Animals described as adults were also said to come from the breeding tank, so age and cohort identity are unclear; a 75-day label does not establish reproductive maturity. The study tested no diet, protein level, feeding frequency, digestibility, long-term health or lifespan outcome and cannot prescribe stage-specific food.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
System observation or method study
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Wild et al., 2025. Animals 15(12): 1715.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina genus, cherry-red breeder line without species-level identification
Study shape: Sixty euthanized shrimp were divided across 12 fixation and processing variants, implying five individuals per variant and confirmed as n = 5 for nucleus-area results. Neutral-buffered formalin, Bouin fluid and Davidson fluid were compared alone and after trypsin digestion, hydrochloric-acid decalcification or abdomen removal before fixation and decalcification.
Experimental unit: Individual post-mortem specimen within a five-shrimp processing variant; five slides with three sections each and 150 measured muscle nuclei per specimen were subsamples, not additional independent animals
Environment: Post-mortem laboratory histology comparison after rearing in three 24 L nursery tanks
Endpoints: section fragility and tearing, subjective fixation, autolysis and staining scores, muscle-cell nucleus area, digital RGB staining measurements, hepatopancreas, ventral nerve cord and muscle preservation.
What it can support: Histological appearance in Neocaridina specimens depends strongly on fixation and processing. Davidson fluid gave the best unmodified preservation among the three tested fixatives, while trypsin and acid decalcification could add tissue damage, autolysis or staining artifacts; abdomen removal followed by Davidson fixation and decalcification scored best overall in this laboratory comparison.
What it cannot support: This was a post-mortem laboratory method study, not a live-animal health, diagnosis, treatment or husbandry experiment. The source identified animals only to genus and used one breeder line, did not report sex, random allocation, assessor blinding, inter-rater agreement or tank-to-treatment balance, and used only five animals per variant. Multiple sections, nuclei and pixels are specimen subsamples. Subjective score sums were reported without uncertainty, and one-way ANOVA with Fisher NIR post hoc testing does not remove small-group or multiplicity concerns. Autolysis and altered staining can be preparation artifacts rather than evidence of illness before death. The chemicals and dissection steps are hazardous laboratory procedures, and the reported 40 mg/L MS222 method lacks time-to-death, confirmation and buffering details, so it is not a validated home euthanasia protocol.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Gao, Duan, Sun and Zhang, 2024. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 42.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina denticulata sinensis
Study shape: Two calcium-associated cuticle genes were cloned and profiled across molt stages and tissues. Small stage-matched groups received RNA interference, cuticle structure was examined by electron microscopy and recombinant proteins were tested for calcium and chitin binding.
Experimental unit: Individual shrimp, prepared tissue or isolated-protein assay, depending on endpoint; several RNA interference comparisons used three to five shrimp per group
Environment: Laboratory molt staging, molecular manipulation, microscopy and isolated-protein assays
Endpoints: molt-stage gene expression, cuticle ultrastructure, calcium binding, chitin binding, calcium carbonate precipitation.
What it can support: NdCAP-1 and NdCAP-2 expression varied by molt stage and tissue, gene knockdown changed cuticle surface structure and the recombinant proteins bound calcium and chitin under the tested assays.
What it cannot support: The study did not assign water calcium, magnesium, GH or diet treatments. Its small molecular-manipulation groups do not establish a hardness target, diagnose an incomplete molt or show that a mineral supplement prevents failure.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Luna-Vivaldo et al., 2024. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 52(2): 298-306.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Each phenotype received alginate spheres containing live Haematococcus pluvialis, live Spirulina platensis or no microalgae, while all groups also received the same commercial food. The article reports 11 juveniles per basket and four basket replicates, then measured uropod optical density, chromatophore number and chromatosome area at the end of 31 days.
Experimental unit: Supplement-treatment basket containing 11 juveniles, with four basket replicates reported; baskets received shared recirculating culture water, and the one-way ANOVA description does not state that basket or water system was modeled as the independent unit
Environment: Three-day-old juveniles from pet-trade-derived wild, Fire Red and Diamond Blue stocks held for 31 days in maternity baskets within recirculating culture water at 28 C
Endpoints: uropod optical density, chromatophore number, chromatosome area, 31-day survival.
What it can support: The two live-microalgae sphere treatments changed selected uropod colour measures relative to the no-microalgae sphere control, with different patterns in wild, Fire Red and Diamond Blue juveniles. All groups had 100 percent survival during the 31-day test.
What it cannot support: Shared recirculating water limits independent system replication, and the allocation and analysis descriptions do not clearly preserve basket-level independence. Imaging occurred only at the endpoint after one minute in ice water, with no blinded scoring or repeated individual baseline stated. Internally inconsistent significance wording for chromatosome area and missing raw data limit reconstruction. Equal survival across every group does not demonstrate a survival benefit. The study did not measure growth, health, reproduction, permanence after withdrawal or genetic change, and it does not validate a commercial powder, spoon dose, home algae culture method, grade guarantee or ice-water handling protocol.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Ostróżka et al., 2024. The European Zoological Journal.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: The authors first screened nominal 0.09, 0.9 and 3.63 mg Ni/L, selected 3.63 mg Ni/L after observing about 50 percent mortality at 14 days, then compared one- and two-week exposures and one- or two-week clean-water periods. Whole-body nickel, midgut structure, reserves, reactive-oxygen and cell-death measures were assessed. The linked CC BY deposit supplies quantitative tables and microscopy files.
Experimental unit: Individually held adult for exposure, with animal, whole-body preparation or isolated organ used according to endpoint. The deposited TXRF table has three numbered samples per group, while reactive-oxygen tables contain uneven row counts and repeated analysis dates that do not identify every row as an independent animal.
Environment: Adult shrimp exposed individually to nickel chloride for one or two weeks, followed by one or two weeks in clean water at 21 C, pH 7 and GH 10
Endpoints: preliminary mortality, whole-body nickel, intestinal degeneration, hepatopancreatic change, reserve material, reactive oxygen species, autophagic signals, apoptosis and necrosis, clean-water response.
What it can support: At the selected high nominal nickel treatment, adults accumulated nickel and showed organ- and time-associated cellular damage; some measured changes persisted after one or two weeks in clean water.
What it cannot support: The approximately 50 percent 14-day mortality was a preliminary selection observation, not a reported formal LC50 estimate with uncertainty. The deposit measures nickel in whole-shrimp samples, not the exposure water, so 3.63 mg Ni/L remains nominal; the recovery groups necessarily contained survivors, controls remained in the continuous culture and the repository does not resolve whether every reactive-oxygen row is a biological unit rather than a repeat or batch observation. It does not establish whole-animal recovery, a household threshold, a copper or fertilizer limit, or a diagnosis from appearance.
Related source material: CC BY quantitative and image dataset
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Rodriguez et al., 2024. Scientific Reports 14: 9536.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Sequential concentration and exposure-time series assessed visible sedation, movement, image-derived heart rate and recovery in clean tank water.
Experimental unit: Individual shrimp immersion and observation; concentration series were run sequentially rather than as replicated aquaria
Environment: Individual 300 mL laboratory immersion baths using eugenol dissolved with ethanol
Endpoints: time to observed sedation, movement during sedation, image-derived heart rate, observable recovery.
What it can support: Eugenol immersion reduced movement and image-derived heart rate under the tested research protocol, with substantial individual response variation at lower concentrations.
What it cannot support: The study did not include an ethanol-only vehicle control, long-term survival or chronic sublethal follow-up. Observable recovery is not proof of no harm, and the research imaging protocol is not a home handling, treatment or euthanasia instruction.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Neocaridina identity evidence
Yang et al., 2024. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46: 12279-12298.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi, N. denticulata and N. heteropoda complex
Study shape: Morphological characters, mitogenomes, genetic distances and phylogeny were compared across three forms.
Experimental unit: Examined specimen and sequence
Environment: Integrative specimen study from the Baiyangdian drainage area
Endpoints: morphological differentiation, mitogenomic distance, phylogenetic placement.
What it can support: A published proposal to combine several named forms under Neocaridina denticulata.
What it cannot support: The current DecaNet authority has not adopted that proposal, and the paper does not identify aquarium stock from colour.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Hoitsy et al., 2023. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 145(6): 351-358.
Source taxon as published: Owner-submitted captive Neocaridina davidi from multiple breeders; host-identification method not reported
Study shape: Owners submitted 15 shrimp from different breeders after seeing moving white organisms on the day of introduction or within the following days. The shrimp were photographed, and associated live worms were collected into water drops, examined by stereomicroscopy and light microscopy, and identified from stated morphological references.
Experimental unit: Selected submitted shrimp for carrier observations and an unreported number of removed worms for morphological identification; five shrimp shared each of three holding aquaria, but no treatment or outcome comparison was assigned
Environment: Fifteen selected diagnostic submissions held five per approximately 18-litre aquarium at reported pH 6.8, conductivity 300 microsiemens and 25 C during examination
Endpoints: visible worm count and body region, worm length, live worm morphology, species identification, presence of worm eggs in the branchial chamber.
What it can support: All 15 selected shrimp carried visible opalescent-white moving worms, with 2 to 8 observed on the head, antennae or rostral region. Examined worms were reported as 0.8 to 2.0 mm long and identified as Scutariella japonica using paired anterior projections, two eyespots, internal reproductive anatomy and a posterior horseshoe- or heart-shaped sucker. Some worms contained eggs, and eggs were visible through the lateral carapace in the branchial chamber.
What it cannot support: This was a selected diagnostic case series, not a prevalence, transmission, quarantine-duration, water-quality or source-risk study. Host identity was not independently verified, source counts and clustering were not reported, the number of worms examined was omitted, and no molecular confirmation, voucher or image-accession record was stated. The study measured no respiration, gill lesion, molting failure, growth, reproduction, mortality, spontaneous clearance or treatment outcome. Harm statements were literature synthesis, not observations in these 15 shrimp. Fenbendazole was mentioned in one discussion sentence without product, dose, exposure, allocation, control, efficacy, recurrence or host-safety data. It cannot support a treatment recipe, a claim that every white worm is S. japonica or use of treatment response as diagnosis.
Related source material: University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest repository record and open PDF
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Maciaszek et al., 2023. Animals 13(10): 1616.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: One hundred shrimp from each of three locations within each source category were inspected individually in rostral, branchial, pereiopodal and pleopodal regions. Epibionts were isolated under clove-oil and ethanol sedation, identified morphologically at 500 to 1500x, and followed by an incompletely reported two-week quarantine observation. Prevalence models used source category and sex, microhabitat models used body region, and Spearman correlations assessed co-occurrence, egg production and molting.
Experimental unit: Individual examined shrimp nested within nine source locations and their transport bags; the reported individual-level GLMs do not describe source location or bag as a cluster or random effect
Environment: Nine hundred approximately 2.0 cm shrimp collected in November 2018 from three wild sites, three aquaculture-pond sources and three aquarium sources in Taiwan, then air-freighted in habitat water to Poland and inspected after a 10-hour acclimation in the transport-bag water
Endpoints: morphological identity and measurements, prevalence and mean intensity, co-occurrence, body-region distribution, egg-production association, molting association, observed cuticle traces and recolonization after molt.
What it can support: The authors distinguished Cladogonium kumaki, Monodiscus kumaki, Scutariella japonica and Holtodrilus truncatus, plus ciliates and rotifers. At least one recorded epibiont occurred on 688 of 900 shrimp and H. truncatus on 390 of 900. All four named taxa occurred in all four body regions with different distributions; H. truncatus was relatively associated with rostral and pereiopodal regions. Live H. truncatus and temnocephalids were observed leaving shed exuviae and seeking a host, sometimes recolonizing the nearby original shrimp.
What it cannot support: The source categories were observed, not assigned treatments, and are represented by only three locations each. Transport, ten-hour acclimation and microscopy handling may have changed organism abundance or location. Source-level clustering was not included in the reported GLMs, the sample was strongly female-skewed, and the sexing method was not stated. Morphological identification required microscopy and does not validate a phone-image diagnosis. Egg and molt analyses were correlational; the H. truncatus molt row reports rho -0.26 with p 0.847, an internally inconsistent combination for the surrounding interpretation. The quarantine allocation, denominator, water conditions, removal exposure and outcome measurements were not fully reported. Molting did not clear live worms, and the paper did not assign or compare a salt, medication or home-removal treatment. The sample is not prevalence for every seller, home colony or geographic trade route.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Neocaridina identity evidence
Li et al., 2022. Journal of Experimental Biology 225(6): jeb243702.
Source taxon as published: Animals sold as Neocaridina heteropoda from a local aquatic market and cultured in the laboratory for more than six months; no voucher, morphology or molecular host-identification method reported
Study shape: A tracer pilot compared 1000 ng/uL dextran with 0.05 percent Phenol Red. For editing, three Nh-scarlet sgRNAs were designed using a partial Neocaridina sequence and the Penaeus vannamei genome as reference. Cas9 at 300 ng/uL and sgRNA at 200 ng/uL were delivered at about 0.8 nL per embryo; individual sgRNAs were checked at gastrula and all three were co-injected for the flea-larva eye-phenotype screen.
Experimental unit: Individual embryo for injection and phenotype screening. Twenty-eight injected embryos survived to the reported Neocaridina screen, but the initial number injected, maternal-clutch contributions, allocation, complete control structure and tracer-table denominator or replicate basis were not reported.
Environment: One-cell embryos removed from females four hours after spawning, placed on wet filter paper with the upper surface exposed to air, injected and irrigated three times daily with sterilized freshwater through in vitro development
Endpoints: embryo survival by developmental stage, Nh-scarlet expression by developmental stage, visible eye pigmentation and shape, target-region PCR and sequencing.
What it can support: The method delivered CRISPR/Cas9 material into ex vivo Neocaridina embryos and recovered target-region insertions, replacements or deletions with altered eye phenotypes in three of 28 surviving injected embryos: two with altered eye shape and one with an absent eye.
What it cannot support: The authors called 3 of 28 surviving injected embryos a 10 percent gene-editing efficiency; the denominator excludes embryos that did not survive, and the initial injected total was not reported. Screening was based on abnormal eyes, so phenotype-normal survivors were not shown to have been systematically genotyped. Some embryos contained more than one edited sequence, consistent with mosaicism. Off-target effects were not assessed, one sgRNA lacked detectable in vitro digestion, and exact family contributions, randomization, blinding and complete negative-control comparisons were not reported. The study ended at early development and did not test adult survival, health, body colour, fertility, germline transmission, F1 inheritance, stable-line creation, commercial grade, named-trade-line identity or a consumer genetic test. The invasive embryo method is a functional-genomics protocol, not a hobby breeding procedure.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Ostróżka et al., 2022. Micron 154: 103162.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Midgut tissues were compared across dimethoate exposure and recovery intervals.
Experimental unit: Animal and prepared midgut tissue
Environment: One to three weeks of laboratory exposure followed by clean-water recovery
Endpoints: midgut tissue damage, cellular regeneration, recovery interval.
What it can support: The tested exposure damaged midgut tissues and recovery responses differed among organs and intervals.
What it cannot support: It does not establish that a fixed clean-water period clears an aquarium or restores every biological endpoint.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Field observation
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Bauer et al., 2021. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 146: 107-115.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Twenty submitted shrimp were assessed with clinical examination, wet mounts, microbiology, histology and sequencing of green pleopodal structures.
Experimental unit: Submitted shrimp, tissue section or algal sample, depending on method
Environment: Diagnostic examination of an imported commercial group during a multifactorial outbreak
Endpoints: organism morphology, sequence placement, cuticle penetration, co-occurring microbes, outbreak mortality history.
What it can support: The green organism was placed near Trentepohliales and rhizoids were observed penetrating cuticle into subcutaneous tissue.
What it cannot support: The multifactorial case does not assign every death to the alga, establish prevalence or let a green phone image confirm the organism.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Budi et al., 2020. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 44(2): 456-462.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Visible ovary stages were paired with histology and fecundity observations.
Experimental unit: Individual female
Environment: Laboratory culture of a red stock at 28 to 29 C
Endpoints: ovarian stage, histology, fecundity.
What it can support: A visible ovary can support female-sex and ovarian-stage observations under the documented criteria.
What it cannot support: A hidden ovary does not prove male sex, and the stage timing is not a universal spawning countdown.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Shih, Cai and Chiu, 2019. ZooKeys 817: 11-23.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina fonticulata Shih, Cai and Chiu, 2019, described from type and additional material collected at Sheding, Kenting, southern Taiwan
Study shape: The authors described a holotype, multiple paratype lots and additional field material using external morphology and drawings, compared material of Neocaridina ikiensis, measured five eggs from each of four ovigerous females, and analyzed a 658-base-pair mitochondrial COI segment from four Sheding specimens with Bayesian and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic methods and pairwise distances.
Experimental unit: Individual deposited specimen for morphology, four source shrimp for COI that yielded one reported haplotype, and 20 eggs nested within four ovigerous females for egg measurements
Environment: A leaf-litter layer in a small, slow-flowing headwater stream beside a spring outlet on a limestone hill at Sheding, Kenting; the paper reports about 25 C water, pH 7.06 to 7.16 and dissolved oxygen 7.33 to 7.70 mg/L at the collection site, while examined specimens were preserved in 70 to 95 percent ethanol
Endpoints: type locality and deposited material, rostrum and appendage diagnostic characters, male first and second pleopod morphology, egg dimensions, live colour description, COI haplotype and phylogenetic placement, pairwise mitochondrial distance.
What it can support: The combined type material, comparative morphology and sampled COI evidence support recognizing N. fonticulata as a distinct Neocaridina species in the reviewed 2019 treatment. Diagnostic evidence includes the rostrum, pereiopods and male first and second pleopods. The four sequenced shrimp produced one 658-base-pair COI haplotype, LC427866, and the smallest reported K2P distances to sampled N. ketagalan and N. saccam were 5.42 and 5.43 percent.
What it cannot support: The species was then known only from one Sheding locality, so the report does not establish its complete distribution, population size, seasonal habitat range or conservation status; the authors prediction that it may occur in eastern Taiwan was not a sampled result. Several diagnostic characters require an adult male, dissection and specialist comparison, so body colour or one aquarium photograph cannot identify the species or distinguish it from a trade morph. The molecular result used four shrimp, one mitochondrial haplotype and no nuclear locus, cross, genomic ancestry test or blind identification validation. Mitochondrial separation in this sample does not authenticate a seller label, certify a colour line, prove reproductive isolation or identify another animal by appearance. Site temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen are locality observations without temporal replication or an assigned comparison, not aquarium optima, tolerances or care targets. Aquarium-held photographs were for observation after collection, not a husbandry experiment.
Related source material: GenBank COI accession LC427866
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Tomas et al., 2019. Invertebrate Biology 138(1): 17-28.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Male reproductive structures and spermatophore formation were described with dissection and microscopy.
Experimental unit: Prepared individual male and tissue specimen
Environment: Laboratory dissection and microscopy
Endpoints: testis and vas deferens anatomy, spermatophore formation, sperm structure.
What it can support: Method-confirmed male reproductive anatomy.
What it cannot support: It does not make internal reproductive organs visible or diagnosable in an ordinary aquarium image.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Włodarczyk et al., 2019. PeerJ 7: e7399.
Source taxon as published: Adult Neocaridina davidi obtained from local shrimp breeders
Study shape: Non-starved controls were compared with adults deprived of feed for 14 days and with groups re-fed for 4, 7 or 14 days after the same deprivation. DHE flow cytometry and confocal imaging assessed reactive-oxygen signals, immunofluorescence assessed MnSOD and a control-tissue western blot checked antibody specificity.
Experimental unit: Shrimp were isolated individually, but Table 1 lists 24 animals per flow-cytometry group and four per confocal method while the statistical section says assays used 5 to 6 samples in duplicate; the animal-to-assay sample mapping and any pooling are not fully reported
Environment: Adults were held in one 40-litre laboratory tank at 21 C, pH 7 and 10 dH, then isolated in shaded 250 mL containers with algae suppressed, excrement removed and 10 percent of the water replaced daily
Endpoints: percentage of DHE-labelled ROS-positive cells, qualitative tissue DHE signal, qualitative MnSOD immunofluorescence, antibody-specificity western blot.
What it can support: Under the tested algae-suppressed conditions, 14 days without feed increased the reported mean ROS-positive cell fraction from 2.8 to 13.2 percent in the hepatopancreas and from 1.3 to 12.7 percent in the intestine. Reported values declined toward control levels after 7 to 14 days of re-feeding, alongside weaker MnSOD immunofluorescence.
What it cannot support: The study tested one 14-day deprivation, not a weekly fast, and measured dissected-cell oxidative-stress markers rather than a survival, growth, molting, behaviour, reproduction or longevity benefit. Its isolated 250 mL containers deliberately suppressed algae and do not represent a conditioned community aquarium. Random allocation and blinding were not reported, sex was omitted from the analysis, assay sample mapping is incomplete, MnSOD treatment differences were not quantitatively measured, and the table, figure and statistical-method descriptions make the comparison-letter interpretation ambiguous. It cannot establish that routine fasting is beneficial, that missing one normal feeding is harmful, that biofilm is adequate, or that a specific re-feeding schedule is safe.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Włodarczyk, Student and Rost-Roszkowska, 2019. Canadian Journal of Zoology 97(4): 294-303.
Source taxon as published: Adult male and female Neocaridina davidi obtained from local shrimp breeders
Study shape: Adults were deprived of feed for 7, 14 or 21 days, and subsets were re-fed for 4, 7 or 14 days. TEM, TUNEL, LysoTracker and caspase-3 methods assessed intestine and hepatopancreas cells. Non-starved reference values and images were imported from a 2016 paper rather than produced as a concurrent control group.
Experimental unit: Shrimp were isolated individually, but Table 1 lists 10 TEM animals and 8 animals for each confocal method in most groups while quantitative Tables 2 and 3 report n = 5; animal reuse, pooling and the cell-to-animal analysis hierarchy are not resolved
Environment: Adults came from one 40-litre laboratory tank at 21 C, pH 7 and printed total hardness of 10 degrees d, then were isolated in shaded 250 mL containers with algae suppressed, excrement and exuviae removed and 10 percent of the water replaced daily
Endpoints: midgut cell ultrastructure, autophagosome-bearing cell percentage, TUNEL-labelled cell percentage, qualitative LysoTracker signal, qualitative caspase-3 signal, unquantified mortality during 21-day deprivation.
What it can support: Within this linked laboratory series, 7 and 14 days without feed were associated with more reported autophagosome-bearing midgut cells, and tissue descriptions after 14 days included fewer organelles and less reserve material. After re-feeding, qualitative tissue structure and the reported cellular markers moved toward the earlier non-starved reference.
What it cannot support: This paper reused the prior experimental procedure and imported its non-starved controls, so it is not independent replication and does not provide a concurrent baseline. Most animals deprived for 21 days reportedly died, but mortality counts, timing and survival analysis were absent; the paper says that group was not quantitatively analyzed even though Table 1 lists post-21-day TEM specimens. Re-feeding food amount, frequency and intake were not reported. Table 1 animal counts conflict with the n = 5 quantitative tables, the nested cell and animal hierarchy is unclear, random allocation and blinding were not reported, and the t tests omit comparison pairs, assumptions, exact p values and multiplicity handling. Table 3 prints zero means with positive standard deviations for nonnegative percentages, which is internally impossible. Caspase-3 and LysoTracker results were qualitative, marker validation was limited, and the TUNEL threshold was described as arbitrary. The study measured no growth, molting, behaviour, reproduction, longevity or whole-animal recovery and cannot establish a routine fast, safe missed-feeding interval, re-feeding recipe, home diagnosis or health benefit.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Field observation
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Mitsugi and Suzuki, 2018. Crustacean Research 47: 9-16.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Monthly field samples were used for morphology, size-frequency cohorts and inferred life history.
Experimental unit: Monthly river sample
Environment: Tomoe River, eastern Japan, sampled monthly for one year
Endpoints: body and carapace length, sex characters, cohort structure, inferred lifespan.
What it can support: Defined measurement landmarks and field cohort estimates for the sampled population.
What it cannot support: Individuals were not marked from hatch to death, and the inferred lifespan is not an aquarium average or guarantee.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Pantaleão et al., 2017. Aquaculture Research 48(2): 553-569.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Animals were followed through twelve post-hatching stages with microscopy and defined carapace measurements.
Experimental unit: Individual developmental observations within one culture protocol
Environment: Laboratory aquarium culture at 25 C
Endpoints: appendage development, sex differentiation, carapace length, first attached eggs.
What it can support: Stage-specific external development, the method used to distinguish sex and first reproduction observed under the tested protocol.
What it cannot support: It does not promise that home shrimp can be sexed at a fixed age, reach a universal breeding size or carry eggs by a fixed day.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Controlled experiment
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Sonakowska et al., 2017. PLOS ONE 12(3): e0173563.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Midgut cell and mitochondrial responses were compared through starvation and refeeding periods.
Experimental unit: Animal and prepared midgut tissue
Environment: Laboratory starvation and refeeding experiment with tissue analysis
Endpoints: cell structure, mitochondrial potential, regeneration after refeeding.
What it can support: Starvation and refeeding changed method-confirmed midgut cell outcomes.
What it cannot support: It does not establish a routine fast, nutritional adequacy, a safe missed-feeding duration or a diagnosis from appearance.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Ahn and Min, 2016. Journal of Species Research 5(3): 459-462.
Source taxon as published: Wild stream shrimp identified only as Neocaridina sp.; no host voucher, diagnostic method or molecular host identification reported
Study shape: The authors removed worms from preserved host exoskeletons under a stereomicroscope, described external and internal morphology, deposited examined material at Inha University and the National Institute of Biological Resources, and extracted whole-body DNA from one worm for partial mitochondrial COI amplification and sequencing.
Experimental unit: An unreported number of Neocaridina hosts and removed worms across three collection dates; one whole worm for the 674-base-pair COI sequence; three National Institute of Biological Resources voucher identifiers were listed
Environment: Hand-net collections from Andeok Valley, Jeju-do Province, South Korea on 23 June 2010, 23 August 2015 and 18 May 2016; hosts were preserved directly in 95 percent ethanol at the collection site
Endpoints: geographic and host occurrence, whole-body and jaw morphology, body length, voucher deposition, partial mitochondrial COI sequence.
What it can support: The record establishes morphologically identified H. truncatus on wild Neocaridina sp. at one South Korean stream across material dated in 2010, 2015 and 2016. Described characters included a transparent terete body under 2 mm, no trunk appendages, a posterior sucker about the diameter of the head region and paired jaws with a 7/7 dental formula. Three NIBR voucher identifiers and the first reported 674-base-pair COI sequence for the genus, GenBank KX683299, provide checkable taxonomic anchors.
What it cannot support: The paper does not state the number of hosts collected, hosts carrying worms, worms examined per date, worms per host, sampling effort or whether absence was assessed, so three dated collections do not estimate prevalence, persistence between dates or geographic range. The host remained Neocaridina sp. without a reported voucher or molecular identification. Although examined material was deposited at two institutions, only three NIBR identifiers were listed and the paper does not map individual morphology, image, sequence and voucher records. The single COI sequence created a barcode reference but was not compared with an existing conspecific sequence or used in a phylogenetic or species-delimitation analysis. Immediate ethanol preservation precluded live attachment, movement and host-response observations. The study measured no lesion, respiration, molting, growth, reproduction, mortality, transmission, origin, treatment, recurrence or host safety. It cannot establish N. davidi prevalence, aquarium-trade origin, harmlessness, a phone-image diagnosis, a quarantine duration or a treatment protocol.
Related source material: Korea Citation Index open article record and licensed PDF
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Sganga, Piana and López Greco, 2016. Zootaxa 4196(1): 120-128.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina davidi
Study shape: Carapace shape was analysed in 92 animals and second abdominal pleura in 61 after sex assignment from pleopod morphology.
Experimental unit: Individual measured shrimp
Environment: Laboratory geometric morphometric study of cultured animals
Endpoints: carapace size and shape, rostrum shape, second pleuron dimensions, sex-associated overlap.
What it can support: Adult females were larger on average and differed in several shapes, while male carapace shape overlapped juvenile female shape.
What it cannot support: Average adult differences do not confirm the sex of every individual, especially a juvenile or an animal shown from one angle.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Sonakowska et al., 2016. PLOS ONE 11(2): e0147582.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina heteropoda obtained from local breeders; no host-identification method reported
Study shape: Light, transmission-electron and confocal microscopy, acid-phosphatase and LysoTracker staining, TUNEL labeling and JC-1 flow cytometry were used to describe autophagy, apoptosis, necrosis and mitochondrial potential in intestine and hepatopancreas tissue from method-specific adult groups. No external stressor or disease treatment was assigned.
Experimental unit: Prepared tissue or cell suspension from method-specific adult specimens: 15 females and 15 males for general microscopy, three adults for quantitative necrosis and autophagy cell counts, two for TEM acid-phosphatase staining, 10 females and 10 males for cryosections, five pooled within each organ suspension preparation and seven for JC-1 flow cytometry; the TUNEL animal denominator was not stated
Environment: Adults maintained in 30 L laboratory aquaria at 24 C, pH 7 and 15 degrees German total hardness and fed a commercial freshwater-shrimp food
Endpoints: cell-type and organ location, autophagic structures, TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells, necrotic-cell morphology, mitochondrial membrane potential, sex comparison.
What it can support: Under the described laboratory history and without an assigned external stressor, the examined adult tissues contained autophagic, apoptotic and occasional necrotic cells. Autophagy was observed in mature intestine D cells and hepatopancreas B and F cells, apoptosis in anterior-intestine D cells and proximal hepatopancreas B and F cells, while regenerative cells showed none of the three reported processes. The study did not report a statistically significant intestine-versus-hepatopancreas difference in cells with depolarized mitochondria.
What it cannot support: This is destructive cellular and tissue evidence, not a visible home diagnosis or a disease experiment. Breeder source, sex and adult status were reported, but host identification, age, molt stage, reproductive state, tank count, animals per tank, acclimation duration, health screening, water-test methods and the TUNEL animal denominator were not. Method groups differed and their overlap was not reported. Cell counts were nested within only three adults for the necrosis and autophagy percentages, TUNEL used an arbitrary fluorescence threshold and sex-specific values or tests were not shown. Table 1 prints 938 autophagic cells from 231 total for intestine specimen 3 even though the displayed 40.26 percent implies 93. The results do not establish a gross sign, pathogen, cause of illness, welfare state, treatment target, aquarium optimum or safe exposure, and the maintained 24 C, pH 7 and 15 degree hardness history was not an assigned comparison.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
System observation or method study
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Tanaka, Wada and Hamasaki, 2016. Zoological Science 33(2): 154-161.
Source taxon as published: Holtodrilus truncatus; field hosts included Paratya compressa, Caridina leucosticta, Caridina multidentata, Caridina typus and Neocaridina denticulata
Study shape: The field survey standardized dip-net sampling at ten waterside areas per site and repeated one river seasonally. The salinity study exposed 24, 20, 30, 25 and 12 host-removed worms to nominal 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 3 percent salinity without food, with observation intervals that shortened as salinity rose. Host-choice tests placed one worm with a size-matched pair of Paratya compressa, Caridina leucosticta or Caridina multidentata for 40, 36 and 39 pairwise replicates.
Experimental unit: Field host shrimp for occurrence endpoints; an incompletely reported small plastic tank holding two or five isolated worms for salinity exposure; and one worm with one two-shrimp species pair for each host-choice replicate
Environment: Field collections at one to eight sites in each of 26 rivers on the Kii Peninsula, Japan, plus 22 to 27 C freshwater laboratory salinity and two-host choice tests
Endpoints: river and host occurrence, prevalence and intensity on Paratya compressa, host body location, Paratya compressa egg number association, isolated-worm attachment-defined survival, selected host in pairwise choice.
What it can support: Holtodrilus truncatus occurred in 10 of 26 surveyed rivers and on five atyid host species. The only two examined N. denticulata were both recorded with the worm, which establishes occurrence but not prevalence. Isolated-worm survival declined with increasing nominal salinity, including significantly lower survival at 0.5 than 0 percent. In pairwise tests that excluded Neocaridina, worms selected P. compressa over both Caridina species and C. leucosticta over C. multidentata. Cohabitation was not associated with egg number in the measured P. compressa model.
What it cannot support: The direct Neocaridina result is two field animals, not a representative sample. No Neocaridina entered the salinity, host-choice or egg-number analyses. Worms were removed after the host carapace was detached, so salinity was tested on isolated organisms rather than attached worms or living host shrimp. The work measured no treatment efficacy on a host, shrimp survival, sublethal host effect, recurrence or safety margin. Worms shared exposure containers in groups of two or five, the number of independent tanks was not reported, checking frequency differed by concentration, no food was provided, and floating or failure to attach was classified as death. Nominal salinity tolerance cannot validate a salt dip, 30-second exposure, host-safe dose or Neocaridina host preference.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
System observation or method study
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Cheung et al., 2015. Marine Biotechnology 17(6): 811-819.
Source taxon as published: Laboratory red-patched Neocaridina denticulata denticulata linked to the Kenny et al. stock; the commercial foundation stock had no reported voucher, morphology or molecular host-identification method
Study shape: Three adult females at each of three visually assigned ovarian stages were sampled cross-sectionally. Foregut, intestine including midgut and hindgut, and hepatopancreas were dissected from every female, producing 27 individually sequenced 16S V1-V3 libraries. PCR reactions were run in triplicate and pooled within each library. Ion Torrent reads were processed in QIIME 1.8, clustered into 97 percent OTUs, assigned against Greengenes at 0.5 confidence, rarefied to 14,000 reads and compared with alpha-diversity indices, UniFrac PCoA and UPGMA trees.
Experimental unit: Individual female for ovarian-stage comparisons, with three females per stage and three linked tissue libraries per female. Triplicate PCR reactions were technical replicates pooled within a library, not additional animals. The paper did not report a repeated-measures model for tissues from the same female.
Environment: Adult females from a multigeneration recirculating freshwater laboratory stock at approximately 25 C; all were starved for two days before dissection
Endpoints: quality-filtered 16S read count, 97 percent OTU richness, Chao1 richness, Shannon diversity, phylogenetic diversity, weighted and unweighted UniFrac clustering, relative read abundance by bacterial taxon, SRA accession SRR1735538.
What it can support: Within this nine-female stock after two days of starvation, early-stage foregut and intestine libraries had lower reported alpha diversity than later-stage libraries, hepatopancreas libraries generally differed from gut libraries, and more than 80 percent of early-stage gut reads were assigned to one Coxiella-type OTU. The study provides a public 16S survey associated with tissue region and visually assigned ovarian stage.
What it cannot support: This was a small cross-sectional association, not the same females followed through ovarian development and not an assigned microbiota or reproductive treatment. Stage could be confounded with age, time, individual and egg-carrying status. Relative read abundance is compositional and does not measure absolute bacterial load, prevalence among shrimp or colonization. A short 16S Coxiella-type assignment at a low classification threshold is not a species or strain identification, Coxiella burnetii diagnosis, cultured isolate, pathogen finding or probiotic. The paper reported t tests without specifying exact contrasts, pairing, tails, variance handling, test statistics, degrees of freedom or multiplicity correction, and reported no formal group-level beta-diversity test. No extraction blank, PCR negative control, mock community, random selection or blinding was described. The paper did not test bacterial function, microbial transfer, probiotic or antibiotic exposure, fertility, spawning, hatch, offspring, growth, survival, disease, immune response, feed treatment or normal fed-tank baseline. It cannot show that microbes cause ovarian maturation, that maturation causes the microbiota difference or that changing aquarium bacteria improves breeding or health.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Review or synthesis
Broader ornamental-shrimp review
Mykles and Hui, 2015. Integrative and Comparative Biology 55(5): 891-897.
Source taxon as published: Policy review comparing Neocaridina denticulata with the crayfish Procambarus clarkii and Cherax quadricarinatus, with additional inferences from other crustacean models
Study shape: The authors defined desired traits for a decapod model, compared three freshwater candidates, summarized selected Neocaridina life-history, culture, anatomy and genomic claims from earlier publications, recommended N. denticulata, and proposed obtaining a complete genome and developing tissue-specific gene-control and mutant-screening methods.
Experimental unit: Published source or narrative claim; the paper reported no new animals, aquaria, assigned treatments, measurements or statistical analysis and did not describe a systematic search, eligibility criteria or risk-of-bias assessment.
Environment: No new animal experiment or culture trial; narrative synthesis and recommendation arising from a 2015 comparative Pancrustacea symposium workshop
Endpoints: model-organism selection criteria, comparative recommendation, summary of cited life-history and culture claims, summary of draft-genome status, proposed functional-genomics next steps.
What it can support: The paper documents that two authors recommended N. denticulata as a decapod functional-genomics model in 2015 based on its small space requirement, commercial availability, transparent cuticle, cited life-history traits and then-available preliminary genome. It explicitly identified a complete genome and reliable gene-expression manipulation as future work.
What it cannot support: This policy review is not a new replication of any cited experiment and is not a systematic review. Its pH 6.5 to 8.0, temperature up to 30 C, preferred 22 to 25 C and pH 7.0 to 7.5, 15 to 16 day intermolt, 20 to 30 egg, approximately 30 day hatch and 4 to 6 month maturity statements combine older sources, populations and methods; they are not one standardized aquarium comparison or validated species-wide optimum. The broad statement that N. denticulata is resistant to bacterial infection does not establish general disease resistance, a pathogen-free line, treatment or immune supplement. The cited DPrP bacterial-challenge paper remains full-text-needed in this registry, and the companion crayfish-plague citation studied a related published species against one oomycete pathogen. The preliminary genome was explicitly incomplete, and proposed transgenesis, reporter expression, mutation screening and targeted gene control were future possibilities rather than demonstrated Neocaridina methods in this paper. The review does not validate a care range, breeding calendar, stocking rule, disease guarantee, commercial-line assay or consumer genetic intervention.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Sonakowska et al., 2015. PLOS ONE 10(5): e0126900.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina heteropoda
Study shape: Digestive structures were examined with microtomography, light microscopy and electron microscopy.
Experimental unit: Prepared animal and tissue specimen
Environment: Laboratory microscopy and microtomography
Endpoints: intestine structure, hepatopancreas structure, cell ultrastructure.
What it can support: Method-confirmed internal digestive anatomy in the source taxon.
What it cannot support: An ordinary tank photograph cannot identify these internal organs, function or disease from colour alone.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
System observation or method study
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Niwa et al., 2014. Central European Journal of Biology 9(1): 80-85.
Source taxon as published: Wild Sugo River shrimp identified only as Neocaridina spp.; the catch could include native N. denticulata denticulata and imported Neocaridina lineages
Study shape: The authors collected 271 host shrimp across nine years, mapped H. truncatus body locations on 141 hosts in 2011, measured 23 cocoons, observed 15 host-removed worms from 14 shrimp in no-added-food survival containers, and placed five removed worms sequentially with a reported pool of 28 potential host shrimp across several taxa.
Experimental unit: Individual host for mapped attachment location; individual cocoon for diameter; nominally individual host-removed worm, although only 13 of 15 worms receive a reported container and survival range; and an unresolved sequence of five worms exposed one host at a time in the host-exchange demonstration
Environment: Field collections at three Sugo River stations from 2003 to 2011 plus laboratory observations in source river water, aerated aquaria, individual bottles, dishes and 100 mL vials
Endpoints: host body location, cocoon diameter and embryo count, observed hatching and gill-chamber entry, days survived after host removal, attachment or predation during host exchange, movement from deteriorating to surviving captive hosts.
What it can support: Among 141 mapped wild hosts, reported H. truncatus locations were 55.3 percent between the first pleopod and fifth pereiopod, 17.0 percent on the carapace, 15.6 percent at the eye base, 8.5 percent on the antennule and 3.6 percent around the egg mass. Twenty-three cocoons measured 0.58 to 0.76 mm, and the largest observed cocoon contained 14 developing worms. Ten worms in 100 mL vials survived 7 to 46 days and three in dishes survived 12 to 21 days after host removal without added food. In the host-exchange observation, all five supplied worms attached to Neocaridina hosts within three hours.
What it cannot support: Host shrimp were resolved only to Neocaridina spp. in a river where native and introduced lineages were discussed, so the findings are not species-specific N. davidi evidence. The 271 total catch, 152 animals mentioned in the attachment procedure and 141 mapped hosts are not fully reconciled, station and date denominators are missing and the location percentages do not state whether each host contributed one location or all worms were counted. No molecular confirmation of host or worm identity was reported in this article. The survival containers differed in volume, light and temperature, two of 15 worms are absent from the reported ranges, ages were unknown, water was not renewed or analytically described, death criteria were not stated and there was no fed or host-present control. The five-worm host exchange omitted exposure order, reuse mapping, independent replication, container details and complete outcomes for 28 potential hosts. Disappearance under an opaque crayfish carapace was interpreted as migration rather than directly confirmed. Claims that egg-bearing hosts hatched healthy young had no defined denominator, comparison or follow-up. Observed migration from deteriorating hosts does not establish transmission probability or a quarantine duration. The study measured no controlled shrimp lesion, respiration, growth, reproduction, mortality causation, treatment efficacy, recurrence or host safety and cannot validate predatory tankmates, forced host deterioration, worm collection, medication or a fixed isolation period.
Related source material: German National Library open full-text copy
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Direct Neocaridina evidence
Naruse, Shokita and Cai, 2006. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 119(1): 25-31.
Source taxon as published: Neocaridina iriomotensis Naruse, Shokita and Cai, 2006, described from the upper reaches of Nishifunatsuki in the Nakama River, Iriomote Island, Japan
Study shape: The listed material contains one male holotype, 41 paratypes and 49 non-type specimens collected on seven dates from November 1999 through June 2000. Only specimens above 4 mm carapace length were used for the description. Characters were drawn with a camera lucida and measured to 0.01 mm; proportional summaries report medians, ranges and varying sample sizes from 73 to 83. The treatment compared the new species with published N. anhuiensis and topotypic N. ishigakiensis morphology.
Experimental unit: Individual field specimen for morphological ratios and qualitative seasonal comparison; the paper does not report the female or egg denominator underlying its egg-size and 21-to-82 clutch ranges
Environment: Field-collected from the lower part of a headwater reach in the upper Nakama River, described as about 5 to 10 m wide, approximately 1 m deep and slow-flowing, where shrimp occurred on aquatic vegetation and tree roots with Macrobrachium shokitai; no water chemistry or temperature was reported
Endpoints: deposited type and non-type material, rostrum armature and length, pterygostomian spine, pereiopod proportions, season-associated third-pereiopod form, male first and second pleopod morphology, egg dimensions and reported clutch range, habitat and distribution description.
What it can support: The 2006 morphological treatment supports recognizing N. iriomotensis within its stated species concept and distinguishes its sampled material from N. anhuiensis and N. ishigakiensis using combinations of rostrum, pterygostomian-spine, pereiopod and male pleopod characters. It also documents that the third pereiopod showed sex-associated form in summer specimens but no sexual difference in winter specimens, demonstrating that season can affect the availability of an identification character.
What it cannot support: All listed material came from one named upper-reach locality in the Nakama River, and qualitative wording that the shrimp was common lacks sampling effort and a population denominator. No molecular analysis was included; proposed headwater ecomorph populations had intermediate rostrum lengths and were retained only tentatively pending molecular and ecological study. Published comparisons relied partly on earlier descriptions rather than a balanced multi-population validation, character sample sizes varied because not every specimen contributed every ratio, and no blind key-performance test was conducted. Egg and clutch ranges lack female, clutch and egg denominators. The paper reports no water temperature, pH, hardness, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen measurements, diet, culture comparison or aquarium outcome. It cannot identify an aquarium animal from colour or one photograph, authenticate a seller line, prove genetic separation or reproductive isolation, map the complete species range, establish population abundance, or supply a care target, breeding forecast or seasonal aquarium rule.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.
Morphology or taxonomy
Adjacent biological evidence
Cai and Ng, 1999. Journal of Natural History 33(11): 1603-1638.
Source taxon as published: Caridina serrata species group, including Lam Tsuen material previously reported as Neocaridina serrata
Study shape: Published descriptions, neotypes and re-examined material were compared using rostral formula, stylocerite, pereiopod, pleopod and other morphological characters across the Caridina serrata group.
Experimental unit: Examined specimen and collection lot; the Lam Tsuen conclusion used later material from the same river population, including Dudgeon-collected lots, rather than a reported re-examination of every animal sampled for the 1985 population study
Environment: Museum and field-collected freshwater shrimp material from southern China, including Lam Tsuen River and other Hong Kong localities
Endpoints: taxonomic diagnosis, genus placement, species reassignment, morphological distinction, locality record.
What it can support: The Lam Tsuen population published by Dudgeon in 1985 and 1987 as Neocaridina serrata was reassigned to Caridina cantonensis. The revision also concluded that neither C. cantonensis nor C. serrata belongs in Neocaridina because the distal half of the male first pleopod lacks the Neocaridina condition.
What it cannot support: The revision does not make every aquarium animal sold as C. cantonensis taxonomically verified, resolve all later Caridina species-group relationships or convert Dudgeon field results into captive care guidance. It did not re-run the 1985 population study, and its reassignment does not establish temperature, lifespan, maturity, clutch or abundance rules for N. davidi.
Open the source or open this record in the full research map.